Biodiversity of plants of the Talgar, Enbekshikazakh districts of the Almaty region
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.26577/eb-2019-1-1380Abstract
One of the global challenges of our time is to study the problems and preserve the biological diversity of plants. Therefore, the study of plant biodiversity in any region will always be relevant.
This article presents the results of a study obtained in the course of conducting a systematic analysis of the flora of Talgar and Enbekshikazakh regions the Almaty region. It was revealed that the flora of the study area includes 114 families, of which 10 leading families make up 60.48% of the total species composition of the flora of the study area. The following families occupy the leading position in this taxonomic composition: Asteraceae (225 species, or 14.60%, 71 genus), Poaceae (132 species or 8.56%), Fabaceae - (115 species or 7.46%). The largest genera are Astragalus (44 species or 7.94%), Allium (28 species or 5.05%), Carex (27 species, 4.87%), Potentilla (23 species or 4.15%).
The flora was studied with using traditional methods of floristic and geobotanical research, the main of which was route reconnaissance method.
Based on the analysis of literature data, viewing of the herbarium fund of the Institute of Botany and Phytoinduction of the National Academy of Sciences of Kazakhstan, as well as their own research on the study and collection of plants in the Almaty region, a preliminary annotated list of flora was compiled, including 1541 species belonging to 554 genera and 114 families.
Key words: flora, Talgar, Enbekshikazakh distric ts Almaty region, systematic analysis, biodiversity of plants.
References
2. Ivashchenko A.A. Materials for the flora of the Ile-Alatau National Natural Park // Scientific Journal "Terra" // 2007. - No 2 – P.98– 105
3. Ivashchenko A.A. Rare plants and plant communities of the Ile-Alatau National Park: distribution and state // Scientific. journals Terra. - 2012. - № 2. - P.53-65.
4. Ivashchenko A.A. Materials for the flora of the Ile-Alatau National Park and adjacent territories // Tr. Ile-Alatau National Park. – Astana. - 2015.- No 1. - P.29-71.
5. Baytulin I.O., Ogar N.P, Nesterova S.G., Inelova Z.A. Flora Ileisk Alatau. - Almaty: Kazakh university. - 2017. – P.196
6. Inelova Z., Nesterova S., Kokoreva I. Plant biodiversity in Aksay gorge of Trans-Ili Alatau. First European Symposium // Research, conservation and management of biodiversity in the European seashores (RCMBES), Primarsko, 2017. – P.49.
7. Cunningham S.D., Ow D.W. Promises and Prospects of Phytoremediation // Plant Physiol. – 1996. – Vol. 110. – P. 715-719
8. Barkley T. Floristic studies in contemporary botany // Madroño. – 2000. –No 47. –P.253-258.
9. Hudaberdi M., Nurbay A. The Features of the Vegetation and the Eco-Geography of the Taklamakan Desert in Xinjang, China, Landschaftsentwicklung und Umweltforschung. – 2000. –Vol. 121 –P.52-61
10. Handa IT et al. Consequences of biodiversity loss for litter decomposition across biomes //Nature. – 2014.-Vol. 509. – P.218 – 221.
11. Yasuhara M, Doi H, Wei C-L, Danovaro R, Myhre SE. Biodiversity– ecosystem functioning relationships in long-term time series and palaeoecological records: deep sea as a test bed // Phil. Trans. R. Soc. – 2016. – P.371.
12. Myaskov A.V. Economic Aspects of Biodiversity Conservation in Industrial Regions // Works of Scientific Symposium “Miner's Week 2010” - 2010 - P. 174-186.
13. Ray F., Susan E. Eichhorn Biology of plants // Ecol. Lett. – 2005. – P.686.
14. Brose U., Hillebrand H. Biodiversity and ecosystem functioning in dynamic landscapes // Philosophical Transactions. – 2016. – P.371.
15. Hillebrand H, Matthiessen B. Biodiversity in a complex world: consolidation and progress in functional biodiversity research // Ecol. Lett. –2009. – Vol. 12. –P.1405– 1419.
16. Cardinale BJ et al. Biodiversity loss and its impact on humanity // Nature. – 2012. – Vol. 486. -P.59 – 67.
17. Duffy JE, Carinale BJ, France KE, McIntyre PB, The´bault E, Loreau M. The functional role of biodiversity in ecosystems: incorporating trophic complexity. // Ecol. Lett. – 2007. – Vol. 10. – P.522– 538.
18. Lebedeva N.V., Krivolutsky D.A., Puzachenko Yu.G. Geography and monitoring of biodiversity. - M .: Scientific and methodological center. – 2002. – P. 432 -435.
19. Bracken MES, Friberg SE, Gonzalez-Dorantes CA, Williams SL. Functional consequences of realistic biodiversity changes in a marine ecosystem // Ecol. Lett. – 2008. – P.924 – 928.
20. Isbell F et al. High plant diversity is needed to maintain ecosystem services // Nature. – 2011. – P.477.
21. Reich PB, Tilman D, Isbell F, Mueller K, Hobbie SE, Flynn DFB, Eisenhauer N. Impacts of biodiversity loss escalate through time as redundancy fades. Science. – 2012. – No 336. –P.589– 592
22. Resolution of the Cabinet of Ministers of the Republic of Kazakhstan. On approval by the Republic of Kazakhstan of the Convention on Biological Diversity and the organization of the implementation of its obligations: approved. August 19, 1994, No. 918
23. Nesterova S., Kokoreva I., Inelova Z., Yerubayeva G. «Effect of recreational activities on the main plant communities of the Trans-Ili Alatau» // 17-th International multidisciplinary scientific geoconference (SGEM), Issue 52. Ecology and Environmental Protection, Albena, Bulgaria. –2017. –No 52. – P.289-296.
24. Massol F, Gravel D, Mouquet N, Cadotte MW, Fukami T, Leibold MA. Linking community and ecosystem dynamics through spatial ecology // Ecol. Lett. – 2011. – Vol.14. –P. 313 – 323.
25. Fischer FM, Wright AJ, Eisenhauer N, Ebeling A, Roscher C, Wagg C, Weigelt A, Weisser WW, Pillar VD. Plant species richness and functional traits affect community stability after a flood event. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. // Ecol. Lett. –2016. – 371p.
26. Classifier of administrative and territorial objects. Statistics Committee of the Ministry of National Economy of the Republic of Kazakhstan from November 1, 2017.
27. Agroclimatic guide to the Alma-Ata region // L.: Gidrometeoizdat, 1961. - P.219.
28. Pavlov N.V. Flora of Kazakhstan. - Alma - Ata: Science. - 1956-1967. - Vol. 1-9.
29. Goloskokov V.P. Illustrated determinant of plants of Kazakhstan. - Alma-Ata: Science. - 1969-1972. - Vol.1-2.
30. Baitenov M.S. Flora of Kazakhstan. - Almaty: Science. - 2001. - Vol. 1-2.
31. Tahtajan A.L. Magnoliophyte system. – L: Science. - 1987. - 439 p.
32. Cherepanov S.K. Vascular plants of the USSR. – L.:Science. - 1981. - 509 p.
Reference
1. Ivashchenko A.A. (2006) Zapovedniki i natsionalnyie parki Kazahstana [Nature reserves and national parks of Kazakhstan]. Almaty: Almaty Kitap, 284 p.
2. Ivaschenko A.A. (2007) Materialyi k flore Ile-Alatauskogo natsionalnogo prirodnogo parka [Materials for the flora of the Ile-Alatau National Natural Park]. Nauchnyiy zhurnal «Terra», no 2, pp. 98– 105
3. Ivashchenko A.A. (2012) Redkie rasteniya i rastitelnyie soobschestva Ile-Alatauskogo natsionalnogo parka: rasprostranenie i sostoyanie [Rare plants and plant communities of the Ile-Alatau National Park: distribution and state]. Scientific. journals Terra, vol 2, pp 53-65.
4. Ivashchenko A.A. (2015) Materialyi k flore Ile-Alatauskogo natsionalnogo parka i prilegayuschih territoriy. [Materials on the flora of the Ile-Alatau National Park and adjacent territories]. Astana, no 1, pp. 29-71.
5. Baytulin I.O., Ogar NP, Nesterova S.G., Inelova Z.A. (2017) Flora Ileyskogo Alatau [Flora of the Trans Ili Alatau]. Almaty: Kazakh university, 196 p.
6. Inelova Z., Nesterova S., Kokoreva I. (2017) Plant biodiversity in Aksay gorge of Trans-Ili Alatau. First European Symposium .Research, conservation and management of biodiversity in the European seashores (RCMBES), Primarsko, vol 52, P.49.
7. Cunningham S.D., Ow D.W. (1996) Promises and Prospects of Phytoremediation. Plant Physiol., vol. 110, pp. 715-719.
8. Barkley T. (2000) Floristic studies in contemporary botany. Madroño, vol.47, pp.253-258.
9. Hudaberdi M., Nurbay A. (2000) The Features of the Vegetation and the Eco-Geography of the Taklamakan Desert in Xinjang, China, Landschaftsentwicklung und Umweltforschung. Ecol. Lett vol. 121, pp.52-61.
10. Handa I.T et al. (2014) Consequences of biodiversity loss for litter decomposition across biomes. Nature, vol. 509, pp. 218 – 221.
11. Yasuhara M, Doi H, Wei C-L, Danovaro R, Myhre SE. (2016) Biodiversity– ecosystem functioning relationships in long-term time series and palaeoecological records: deep sea as a test bed. Phil. Trans. R. Soc., 371p.
12. Myaskov A.V. (2010) Ekonomicheskie aspektyi sohraneniya bioraznoobraziya v promyishlennyih regionah [Economic Aspects of Biodiversity Conservation in Industrial Regions]. Works of Scientific Symposium “Miner's Week 2010”, pp.174-186.
13. Ray F., Susan E. (2005) Eichhorn Biology of plants. Ecol. Lett., 686 p.
14. Brose U., Hillebrand H. (2016) Biodiversity and ecosystem functioning in dynamic landscapes. Philosophical Transactions, 371p.
15. Hillebrand H, Matthiessen B. (2009) Biodiversity in a complex world: consolidation and progress in functional biodiversity research. Ecol. Lett., vol. 12, pp.1405– 1419.
16. Cardinale BJ et al. (2012) Biodiversity loss and its impact on humanity.Nature, vol. 486, pp. 59 – 67.
17. Duffy JE, Carinale BJ, France KE, McIntyre PB, The´bault E, Loreau M. (2007) The functional role of biodiversity in ecosystems: incorporating trophic complexity. Ecol. Lett., vol. 10, pp.522– 538.
18. Lebedeva N.V., Krivolutsky D.A., Puzachenko Yu.G. (2002) Geografiya i monitoring bioraznoobraziya [Geography and monitoring of biodiversity]. M:Scientific and scientific-methodical center, 432 p
19. Bracken MES, Friberg SE, Gonzalez-Dorantes CA, Williams SL. (2008) Functional consequences of realistic biodiversity changes in a marine ecosystem. Ecol. Lett., vol.47, pp.924 – 928.
20. Isbell F et al. (2011) High plant diversity is needed to maintain ecosystem services. Nature, 477p.
21. Reich PB, Tilman D, Isbell F, Mueller K, Hobbie S.E, Flynn DFB, Eisenhauer N. (2012) Impacts of biodiversity loss escalate through time as redundancy fades. Science, vol.336, pp.589– 592.
22. Postanovlenie Kabineta Ministrov Respubliki Kazahstan. Ob odobrenii Respublikoy Kazahstan Konventsii o biologicheskom raznoobrazii i organizatsii vyipolneniya predusmotrennyih eyu obyazatelstv: utv. 19 avgusta [Resolution of the Cabinet of Ministers of the Republic of Kazakhstan. On approval by the Republic of Kazakhstan of the Convention on Biological Diversity and the organization of the implementation of its obligations: approved. August 19, 1994]
23. Nesterova S., Kokoreva I., Inelova Z., Yerubayeva G. (2017): Effect of recreational activities on the main plant communities of the Trans-Ili Alatau. 17-th International multidisciplinary scientific geoconference (SGEM),. Ecology and Environmental Protection, Albena, Bulgaria, vol. 52, pp. 289-296.
24. Massol F, Gravel D, Mouquet N, Cadotte M.W, Fukami T, Leibold M.A. (2011) Linking community and ecosystem dynamics through spatial ecology. Ecol. Lett., vol.14, pp. 313 – 323.
25. Fischer F.M, Wright A.J, Eisenhauer N, Ebeling A, Roscher C, Wagg C, Weigelt A, Weisser W.W, Pillar V.D. (2016) Plant species richness and functional traits affect community stability after a flood event. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Ecol. Lett., 371p.
26. Klassifikator administrativno-territorial'nyh ob"ektov. Komitet po statistike Ministerstva nacional'noj ehkonomiki Respubliki Kazahstan ot 1 noyabrya 2017 [Classifier of administrative and territorial objects. Committee on Statistics of the Ministry of National Economy of the Republic of Kazakhstan from November 1, 2017].
27. Agroklimaticheskij spravochnik po Alma-Atinskoj oblasti (1961) [Agroclimatic guide to the Almaty region] L.:Gidrometeoizdat, 219 p.
28. Pavlov N.V. (1956-1967) Flora Kazahstana [Flora of Kazakhstan] Alma - Ata: Science, no 1-9.
29. Goloskokov V.P. (1969-1972) Illyustrirovannyiy opredelitel rasteniy Kazahstana [Illustrated determinant of plants of Kazakhstan]. Alma-Ata: Science, no 1-2.
30. Baitenov M.S. (2001) Flora Kazahstana [Flora of Kazakhstan]. Almaty: Lent, vol.1, pp.245-251.
31. Tahtajyan A.L. (1987) Sistema magnoliofitov [Magnoliophyte system]. L.: Science, 439 p.
32. Cherepanov S.K. (1981) Sosudistyie rasteniya SSSR. [Vascular plants of the USSR]. L.:Science, 509 p.