INTRACTABLE PARADOXES OF EVOLUTION - WITH ALL-ENCOMPASSING GAZE OF A NATURAL PHILOSOPHER

Authors

  • E. E. Ashursky Institute for Scientific Prognosis, Kiev, Ukraine

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.26577/eb.2021.v87.i2.02
        102 91

Abstract

Although Darwin was really ahead of his time on many of the most fundamental issues for science, however, if we talk about the true mechanisms of evolution (as, indeed, about the absence of transitional forms), they still remain the object of sharp, incessant discussions. The same applies to such a fashionable philosophical concept as the "universal noosphere": after all, many people now interpret it in different ways (including as quite real material formations that function, however, according to laws that are not yet completely available to us). Only one thing is clear: these laws are the same for both living and ordinary inert matter. And in addition, in recent years, most modern scientists have begun to tend to the conclusion that the emergence and progressive development of living beings is possible only if there is an appropriate program (plan, project).

The article is devoted to the core and most controversial problems of biology. Its main idea is to postulate the individual mental and the collective noosphere derived from it as the leading factors of evolution. After all, one way or another, it is with their "interested" participation that any dynamic shifts observed in nature are carried out. That is, useful emotional impressions accumulated in ontogenesis by the mental serve as an information base for improving behavioral reflexes in this particular species. And only with some rare saltations (such as, say, the transformation of scales into feathers or forelegs into wings) can we judge the guiding activity of the higher universal mind. Although we are talking about the residual ("posthumous") uni-sphere, which is terminologically very little related to the generally accepted, and much more familiar to philosophers,"Chardin's". It can be described as a giant biocomputer scattered in space, operating at a slower pace compared to current computers, but still having (through its obedient ubiquitous performers – viruses) so far much more power and influence on the fate of modern world civilizations.

References

Al'-Farabi: «Estestvennonauchnye traktaty» // Alma-Ata, 1987.

A. R. Uolles: «Darvinizm. Izlozhenie teorii estestvennogo podbora» // Moskva, 1911

A. Vejsman: «Lekcii po evolyucionnoj teorii» // S-Pb., 1918

V.S. Luk'yanec: «Nauka novogo veka: gumanitarnye transformacii» // Kiev, izd. «Parapan», 2008 g.

V.S. Lukianets: "Science of the new century: humanitarian transformations"

V.S. Krisachenko, V.S. Luk'yanec: "Estestvennonauchnoe myshlenie i sovremennost'"// Kiev, izd. «Naukova dumka», 1989 g.

V.S. Krysachenko, V.S. Lukianets: “Natural-science thinking and modernity”

E.E. Ashshurskij: "Virissimologiya" (cikl statej) //zhurnal "Neveroyatnyj mir", № 9 – 12, 1995 g., S-Pb.

E.E. Ashshurskij: «Vsyo novoe nachinaetsya s proekta» //ezhegodnyj al'manah «Sofiya», Kiev, izd. «Feniks», 2005 g.

G. V. CHefranov: «Bog. Vselennaya. CHelovek» //Taganrog, izd. TRTI, 1992 g.

J.– B. de Lamarck: “Philosophie Zoologique” //Paris, p/h “Muséum national d'histoire naturelle”, 1809.

Lev S. Berg: “Nomogenesis, or Evolution determined by law” //Cambridge (USA), p/h “M.I.T. Press”, 1969

L.S. Berg: «Nomogenez, ili evolyuciya na osnove zakonomіrnostej»

E.E. Ashshurskij: «Skvoz' prizmu filosofskogo analiza» //Kiev, izd. «Pam’yatki Ukraїni», 1998 g.

Emir E. Ashursky: "Through the prism of philosophical analysis"

E.E. Ashshurskij: "Opyt filosofskogo osmysleniya protivorechij sovremennoj nauki" // Kiev, izd. «Esperanca», 1994 g.

Emir E. Ashursky: “The experience of philosophical comprehension of the contradictions of modern science"

E.E. Ashshurskij: «Filosofiya v poiskah i nahodkah» //Kiev, izd. «Esperanca», 1997 g.

Emir E. Ashursky: "Philosophy in search and finds"

V.A. Kordyum et al.: «Transfer of genetic information in an organism» // See sci. collection: “Abstracts of I Ukrainian congress for cell biology”, Lviv, April 25-28, 2004

V.A. Kordyum: “Evolyuciya i biosfera” // Kiev, izd. «Naukova dumka», 1982.

V. A. Kordium: «Evolution and biosphere» - Kyiv: p/h «Naukova dumka», 1982

V.A. Kordyum: “Informacionnye potoki v biosfere” //Kiev, izd. «Akademperiodika», 2016.

V. A. Kordium: «Information flows in biosphere» - Kyiv, p/h «Academperiodika», 2016

P. Courtois: "On time and space decomposition of complex structures" - New York, journal “Communications of the ACM”, vol. 28(6), 1985

Grady Booch: "Object-oriented Analysis" – Boston /USA/, publishing company “Addison Wesley”, 2007

A.M.Ugolev: "Estestvennye tekhnologii biologicheskih sistem"// Leningrad, izd. «Nauka», 1987 g.

V. T. Ivashkin, G. A. Minasyan, A. M. Ugolev: "Teoriya funkcional'nyh blokov"// Leningrad, izd. «Nauka», 1990

David G. Green: "Connectivity and complexity in ecological systems" – Melbourne /Australia/, journal “Pacific Conservation Biology”, vol. 1(3), 1994

Eric Chaisson: “Cosmic evolution: the rise of complexity in nature” - Harvard Univ. /USA/, p/h “Press”, 2001.

Eric Chaisson: "Rhythm of the cosmos: finding unity among the natural sciences" – Medford /USA/, journal “Tufts Magazine”, Spring, 2001.

Reisman K. David (editor): “Before and after Avicenna” - Princeton Univ., New Jersey /USA/, 2001

N.A. Nazarbaev: “My oficial'no priznaem Islam i gordimsya etim faktom!” (videointerv'yu) // Dostup po el. resursu: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J20GOJQDSQQ

Karl Sagan: “Evolyuciya Vselennoj, zhizni i civilizacii” // S-Pb., izd. «Amfora», 2005 g.

Downloads

How to Cite

Ashursky Э. Э. (2021). INTRACTABLE PARADOXES OF EVOLUTION - WITH ALL-ENCOMPASSING GAZE OF A NATURAL PHILOSOPHER. Experimental Biology, 87(2), 16–24. https://doi.org/10.26577/eb.2021.v87.i2.02