THE MYCOBIOTA OAK FORESTS OF THE URAL RIVER VALLEY WITHIN THE WEST KAZAKHSTAN REGION

Authors

  • S.A. Abiev L.N. Gumilyov Eurasian National University, Kazakhstan, Nur-Sultan
  • A.N. Sarsenova L.N. Gumilyov Eurasian National University, Kazakhstan, Nur-Sultan
  • T.E. Darbayeva Makhambet Utemisov West Kazakhstan University, Kazakhstan, Uralsk

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.26577/eb.2022.v91.i2.04
        53 34

Keywords:

: mycobiota, macromycetes, oak forest, Ural river, biodiversity.

Abstract

The study and conservation of biodiversity is one of the global problems of modern biology, since at present in many regions of the planet there is a decrease in the species composition of various organisms, including fungi. The information obtained makes a significant contribution to the knowledge of the diversity of macromycetes of oak forests in the middle reaches of the Ural River, information about which in Kazakhstan is still insufficient and fragmented.

The article presents data on the biodiversity of the mycobiota of oak forests of the Urals valley, growing not only in the floodplain of the river, but also in beams, that is, the ravine forests flowing into the central floodplain. We have registered 31 species belonging to 23 genera, 17 families and five orders. The leading families are Polyporaceae, Boletaceae, Russulaceae, Amanitaceae. As a result of our research, it has been found that the mycological composition in ravine oak forests is richer than in floodplain oak forests. The richness of the species composition of macromycetes appears to have been influenced by well-defined associations in ravine oak forests (22 associations), represented by forest boreal tree-shrub species absent in floodplain oak forests, as well as favorable microclimatic conditions, relief, soil cover and various ecotopes that are not observed in floodplain oak forests (16 associations).

Ecological-trophic analysis showed a predominance of mycorrhizal (45.1%) and xylotrophs (41.9%) over humus saprotrophs (12.9%). The considered taxonomic composition of macromycetes of the studied area is collected, identified and presented for the first time for this region.

Key words: mycobiota, macromycetes, oak forest, Ural river, biodiversity.

References

Venturella, G. (2020). Fungal Diversity in the Mediterranean Area. Diversity, 12(6), 253.

Ruiz-Almenara, C., Gándara, E., & Gómez-Hernández, M. (2019). Comparison of diversity and composition of macrofungal species between intensive mushroom harvesting and non-harvesting areas in Oaxaca, Mexico. PeerJ, 7, e8325.

Zervakis, G. I., Dimou, D., & Polemis, E. (2004). Fungal diversity and conservation in the Mediterranean area: Recent advances in the inventory of Greek macromycetes. Mycologia balcanica, 1, 31-34.

Jones, M. D., & Richards, T. A. (2011). 3 Environmental DNA Analysis and the Expansion of the Fungal Tree of Life. In Evolution of fungi and fungal-like organisms. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 37-54.

Hawksworth LD (2001). The magnitude of fungal diversity: the 1.5 million species estimate revisited. Mycolog Res. 105:1422-

Blackwell, M. (2011). The Fungi: 1, 2, 3… 5.1 million species?. American journal of botany, 98(3), 426-438.

Hawksworth, D. L., & Lücking, R. (2017). Fungal diversity revisited: 2.2 to 3.8 million species. Microbiology spectrum, 5(4),

Rudolph, S., Maciá-Vicente, J. G., Lotz-Winter, H., Schleuning, M., & Piepenbring, M. (2018). Temporal variation of fungal

diversity in a mosaic landscape in Germany. Studies in Mycology, 89, 95-104.

O’Hanlon, R & Harrington TJ (2012a) The macrofungal diversity and community of atlantic oak (quercus petraea and q. robur) forests in ireland. Anales del Jard n Bot nico de Madrid, 69, 107-17.

O’Hanlon, R & Harrington, TJ (2012b) Macrofungal diversity and ecology in four irish forest types. Fungal Ecology, 5, 499-508.

Buee, M, Maurice, JP, Zeller, B, Andrianarisoa, S, Ranger, J, Courtecuisse, R, Mar ais, B & Le Tacon, F (2011) Influence of tree species on richness and diversity of epigeous fungal communities in a french temperate forest stand. Fungal Ecology, 4, 22-31. 12 Angelini, P., Bistocchi, G., Arcangeli, A., Bricchi, E., & Venanzoni, R. (2015). Diversity and ecological distribution of

macrofungi in a site of community importance of Umbria (Central Italy). The Open Ecology Journal, 8(1).

Bisko, N. A., Lomberg, M. L., Mykchaylova, O. B., & Mytropolska, N. Y. (2018). Conservation of biotechnological important species diversity and genetic resource of rare and endangered fungi of Ukraine. Plant & Fungal Research, 1(1), 18-27.

Nyamsuren, K., Magsar, U., Batsumber, S., Myagmardorj, T., Tsogtbaatar, E., Cho, Y., & Kwon, O. (2016). Survey on the distribution of Macrofungi in Mongolia. Journal of Ecology and Environment, 39(1), 91-97.

Mowna Sundari, T., Alwin Prem Anand, A., Jenifer, P., & Shenbagarathai, R. (2018). Bioprospection of Basidiomycetes and molecular phylogenetic analysis using internal transcribed spacer (ITS) and 5.8 S rRNA gene sequence. Scientific Reports, 8(1), 1-18.

Saha, R., Das, D., Tarafder, E., Roy, A., & Acharya, K. (2018). Contribution to the Macromycetes of West Bengal, India: 34–39. Research Journal of Pharmacy and Technology, 11(11), 5123-5129

Dvořák, D., Vašutová, M., Hofmeister, J., Beran, M., Hošek, J., Běťák, J., ... & Deckerová, H. (2017). Macrofungal diversity patterns in central European forests affirm the key importance of old-growth forests. Fungal Ecology, 27, 145-154.

Filippova N, Bulyonkova T (2017) The communities of terrestrial macrofungi in different forest types in vicinities of Khanty- Mansiysk (middle taiga zone of West Siberia). Biodiversity Data Journal 5: e20732. https://doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.5.e20732

Vaishlya, O. B., Kudashova, N. N., Gashkov, S. I., Karbysheva, K. S., & Bakhtinskaya, I. A. (2017). First list of macromycetes forming ectomycorrhizas in cedar and pine forests of Tomsk region of West Siberia. International Journal of Environmental Studies, 74(5), 752-770.

Debnath, S., Upadhyay, R. C., Saha, R., Majumdar, K., Das, P., & Saha, A. K. (2020). A checklist of macrofungi (mushroom) diversity and distributionin the forestsof Tripura, India. Journal of Threatened Taxa, 12(10), 16314-16346.

Petrenko A.Z. and et.al. (1998). Prirodno-resursnyj potencial i proektiruemye ob”ekty zapovednogo fonda Zapadno- Kazahstanskoj oblasti [Natural and resource potential and designed projects of reserved fund of the West Kazakhstan region]. – Uralsk, – p.175.

Mamysheva, М. V., & Darbayeva, Т. Е. (2014). Ekologicheskaya ocenka sovremennogo sostoyaniya dubrav srednego techeniya reki Ural v predelah Zapadno-Kazahstanskoj oblasti [The Environmental assessment of the current state oak of middle reaches of the Ural River within the West-Kazakhstan Region] KazNU Bulletin. Biology series, 60(2), 85-89.

Index Fungorum Database. Available online: http://www.indexfungorum.org/names/names.asp (аccessed on 28 February 2022)

Kirk PM, Cannon PF, Stalpers JA. 2008. Dictionary of the fungi.10th ed. Wallingford: CAB International; p. 719. ISBN

-0-85199-826-8

IPNI. 2008. The International Plant Names Index. Author query. Available: http://www.ipni.org/ipni/authorsearchpage.do

Downloads

Published

2022-06-29

How to Cite

Abiev, S. ., Sarsenova, A. ., & Darbayeva, T. . (2022). THE MYCOBIOTA OAK FORESTS OF THE URAL RIVER VALLEY WITHIN THE WEST KAZAKHSTAN REGION. Experimental Biology, 91(2), 37–45. https://doi.org/10.26577/eb.2022.v91.i2.04