Development of complex scale of diagnostics of perspectivity of Тulipa L. varieties in a Mangyshlak experimental botanical garden
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.26577/eb-2018-4-1361Abstract
The article presents the results of the introduction study of tulip varieties in the collection of the Mangyshlak Experimental Botanical Garden (MEBG), also presents the development of a comprehensive scale for diagnosing the prospects of tulip varieties in arid conditions of Mangistau.
The goal of our research is to identify promising varieties of tulipa and replicate the most decorative of them for usage in landscape design and green building cities and towns Mangistau.
In gardening of settlements and cities of Mangystau Region tulips it is almost not used. Many Dutch tulip varieties, introduced into other climatic conditions, do not fully demonstrate their decorative qualities. Conducting studies on the assessment of varieties makes it possible to identify the most promising varieties that show their biological and decorative properties to the maximum in the new conditions of introduction. The most common scales in the practice of phytointroduction of the method of V.N. Bylov, E.L. Tyshchenko and Yu.V. Timkina and developed on the basis of their approbation of a new regional scale for assessing their prospects with regard to the belonging of a variety to a particular group were chosen to determine the promising qualities of varieties Tulipa hybrida hort.
At present, 152 varieties of tulips from 13 garden classes grow in the collection of flower and ornamental plants of MEBG. This paper presents the results of two-year observations of the varieties of tulips. All attracted varieties of tulips showed high adaptability. Introduced tulips successfully grow in arid conditions of Mangyshlak under favorable conditions, show a high decorative effect and the prospects for introduction into gardening.
Structurally developed regional scale for grades of tulips includes the 11th diagnostic sign, broken into three sections: biological stability; decorative habitus properties; reproductive ability. As a result of the comprehensive assessment, 4 «medium-term», 24 «high-promising», 17 «high-promising» and 5 «very high-promising» tulip varieties were revealed, which allow you to create decorative floral compositions of various types in the conditions of the Mangistau arid zone.
Key words: introduction, varieties tulip, complex scale, perspective, Mangistau conditions.
References
2 Байрамова Г., Белозёров И.Ф., Гурина Т.Ф., и др. Каталог растений Мангышлакского экспериментального ботанического сада / Под редакцией Косаревой О.Н. – Актау, 1994. – 149 с.
3 Иманбаева А.А., Косарева О.Н., Лесниченко В.И., и др. Каталог растений Мангышлакского экспериментального ботанического сада / Под редакцией А.А. Иманбаевой. – Актау, 2009. – 136 с.
4 Иманбаева А.А., Дуйсенова Н.И., Лесниченко В.И., и др. Каталог декоративных растений для озеленения Мангистауской области / Под редакцией А.А. Иманбаевой. Актау, 2012. – 73 с.
5 Иманбаева А.А., Косарева О.Н., Дуйсенова Н.И., и др. Коллекция растений Мангышлакского экспериментального ботанического сада. / Под редакцией А.А. Иманбаевой – Актау, 2017. – 152 с.
6 Байтулин И.О., Бессчетнова М.В., Ляшенко Н.В. Цветы родной земли: монография. А.-Ата: Кайнар, 1981. – 144 с.
7 Sitpayeva G.T., Vesselova P.V., Koudabayeva G.M. Tulipes sauvages du Kazakhstan // Hommes and plantes. – 2011. – N 79. – P. 36-41.
8 Иващенко А. Тюльпаны и другие луковичные растения Казахстана. Алматы: Две столицы, 2005. – 192 с.
9 Scheepen J. Classified List and International Register of Tulip Names. KAVB, 1996. – 632 p.
10 Everett D. The genus Tulipa. Tulips of the World. Kew Dublishing, 2013. – P. 158.
11 Maarten J.M., Christenhusz FLS, Govaerts R. Tiptoe through the tulips – cultural history, molecular phylogenetics and classification of Tulipa (Liliaceae) // Botanical journal of the Linnean Society. – 2013. – 172 (3). – P. 280-328.
12 Judith A. Lesnaw and Said A. Ghabrial. Tulip Breaking: Past, Present and Future // The American Phytopathological Society. Plant Disease. – 2000. – Vol. 84, No.10. – P. 1052-1060.
13 Методика фенологических наблюдений в ботанических садах СССР // Методики интродукционных исследований в Казахстане. Алма-Ата: Наука, 1987. - С. 4-11.
14 Методики интродукционных исследований в Казахстане / Под. ред. М.А. Проскурякова. – А.-Ата. – 1987. – 136 с.
15 Рекомендации по мелиорации почв, зеленому строительству и сельскохозяйственному освоению полуострова Мангышлак. – Шевченко. – 1976. – 45с.
16 Карписонова Р.А. Цветоводство: Научно-популярное издание. М.: Кладезь-Букс, 2007. – 254 с.
17 Карписонова Р.А., Бочкова И.Ю. Культурная флора травянистых декоративных многолетников средней полосы России: Атлас. М.: Фитон+, 2011. – 432 с.
18 Былов В.Н. Основы сравнительной сортооценки декоративных растений // Интродукция и селекция цветочно-декоративных растений. – М.: Наука, 1978. – С.7-32.
19 Тыщенко Е.Л., Тимкина Ю.В. Методические аспекты оценки декоративных признаков гибискуса сирийского (Hibiscus syriacus L.) // Политематический сетевой Научный журнал Кубанского Государственного аграрного университета. – 2011. - № 66(02). – C. 5-17.
20 Иманбаева А.А., Белозеров И.Ф. Комплексная шкала диагностики интродукционной ценности растений в аридных условиях Мангистау // Вестник НАН Белоруси. Сер.биологических наук. – 2017. - № 2. – С.78-86.
21 Смирнов И.А. Методика определения перспективности интродукции древесных растений. Майкоп, 1989. - 34 с.
22 Малова Н. Тюльпаны. М.: ОЛМА-ПРЕСС, 2001. – 96 с.
23 Zonneveld J.M. The systematic value of nuclear genome size for «all» species of Tulipa L. (Liliaceae). // Plant Systematics and Evolution, 2009. – Vol. 281. – P. 217.
24 Veldkamp J.F., Zonneveld B.J.M. The infrageneric nomenclature of Tulipa (Liliaceae). // Plant Systematics and Evolution. – 2011. – Vol. 298. – P. 87.
25 Botschantzeva Z.P. Tulips. Taxonomy, morphology, cytology, phytogeograhy and physiology. / Translated and edited by H.Q. Varekamp. - Rotterdam, 1982. – 236 p.
26 Straley G.B., Utech F.H. Tulipa. // Flora of North America. – 2003. - Vol. 26. – p. 199.
27 Пятницкий С.С. Оценка селекционного материала по засухо¬устойчивости. // Практикум по лесной селекции. М., 1961. – С. 78-102.
References
Bajtulin I.O., Besschetnova M.V., Lyashenko N.V. (1978). Cvety rodnoj zemli [Flowers of the native land]. “Kajnar”, 144 p.
Bayramova G., Belozerov I.F., Gurina T.F. (1994) Katalog rastenij Mangyshlakskogo ehksperimental'nogo botanicheskogo sada [Catalog of plants of Mangyshlak experimental botanical garden] / Pod redakciej Kosarevoj O.N., 149 p.
Botschantzeva Z.P. (1982) Tulips. Taxonomy, morphology, cytology, phytogeograhy and physiology. / Translated and edited by H.Q. Varekamp. Rotterdam, 236 p.
Bylov V.N. (1978) Osnovy sravnitel'noj sortoocenki dekorativnyh rastenij [Basics of comparative variety estimation of ornamental plants] // Introdukciya i selekciya cvetochno-dekorativnyh rastenij. “Nauka”, pp. 7-32.
Duisenova N.I., Imanbaeva A.A., Lesnichenko V.I., Temirbaeva K. (2017) Rezul'taty introdukcii sortov tyul'panov v aridnyh usloviyah Mangyshlaka [Results of the introduction of tulip varieties in the arid conditions of Mangyshlak] // Sbornik nauchnyh trudov GNBS, vol.145, pp. 59-63.
Everett D. (2013) The genus Tulipa. Tulips of the World. Kew Dublishing, P. 158.
Imanbayeva A.A., Belozerov I.F. (2017) Kompleksnaya shkala diagnostiki introduktsionnoy tsennosti rasteniy v aridnykh usloviyakh Mangistau [Complex scale of diagnostics of the plant introduction value in arid conditions of Mangistau] // Vestnik NAN Belorusi. Ser.biologicheskikh nauk, vol. 2, pp. 78-86.
Imanbayeva A.A., Duisenova N.I., Lesnichenko V.I (2012) Katalog dekorativnykh rasteniy dlya ozeleneniya Mangistauskoy oblasti [Catalog of ornamental plants for landscaping Mangistau region] / Pod redaktsiyej A.A.Imanbayevoj, 73 p.
Imanbayeva A.A., Kosareva O.N., Duisenova N.I. (2017) Kollekciya rastenij Mangyshlakskogo ehksperimental'nogo botanicheskogo sada [Plant collection of Mangyshlak Experimental Botanical Garden]. Pod redakciej A.A. Imanbaevoj, 152 p.
Imanbayeva A.A., Kosareva O.N., Lesnichenko V.I. (2009) Katalog rastenij Mangyshlakskogo ehksperimental'nogo botanicheskogo sada [Catalog of plants of Mangyshlak experimental botanical garden] / Pod redakciej A.A. Imanbaevoj, 136 p.
Ivashchenko A. (2005) Tyul'pany i drugiye lukovichnyye rasteniya Kazakhstana [Tulips and other bulbous plants of Kazakhstan]. “Dve stolitsy”, 192 p.
Judith A. Lesnaw and Said A. Ghabrial (2000) Tulip Breaking: Past, Present and Future // The American Phytopathological Society. Plant Disease, vol. 84, No.10, pp. 1052-1060.
Karpisonova R.A. (2007) Cvetovodstvo [Floriculture]. “Kladez'-Buks”, 254 p.
Karpisonova R.A., Bochkova I.YU. (2011) Kul'turnaya flora travyanistyh dekorativnyh mnogoletnikov srednej polosy Rossii. Atlas [Cultural flora of herbaceous ornamental perennials in central Russia. Atlas.]. “Fiton+”, 432 p.
Maarten J.M., Christenhusz FLS, Govaerts R. (2013) Tiptoe through the tulips – cultural history, molecular phylogenetics and classification of Tulipa (Liliaceae) // Botanical journal of the Linnean Society, 172 (3), pp. 280-328.
Malova N. (2001) Tul’pany [Tulips]. “OLMA-PRESS”, 2001, 96 p.
Metodika fenologicheskikh nablyudeniy v botanicheskikh sadakh SSSR [Methods of phenological observations in the botanical gardens of the USSR] // Metodiki introduktsionnykh issledovaniy v Kazakhstane (1987). “Nauka”, pp. 4-11.
Metodiki introdukcionnyh issledovanij v Kazahstane [Methods of introduction studies in Kazakhstan] / Pod. red. M.A. Proskuryakova (1987), p. 136.
Pyatnitskiy S.S. (1961) Otsenka selektsionnogo materiala po zasukhoustoychivosti [Evaluation of breeding material for drought resistance] // Praktikum po lesnoy selektsii, pp. 78-102.
Rekomendacii po melioracii pochv, zelenomu stroitel'stvu i sel'skohozyajstvennomu osvoeniyu poluostrova Mangyshlak [Recommendations on soil reclamation, green building and agricultural development of the Mangyshlak Peninsula]. (1976), P. 45.
Scheepen J. (1996) Classified List and International Register of Tulip Names. “KAVB”, 632 p.
Sitpayeva G.T., Vesselova P.V., Koudabayeva G.M. (2011) Tulipes sauvages du Kazakhstan // Hommes and plantes, vol. 79, pp. 36-41.
Smirnov I.A. (1989) Metodika opredeleniya perspektivnosti introduktsii drevesnykh rasteniy [Method of determining the prospects of introduction of woody plants]. Maykop, 34 p.
Straley G.B., Utech F.H. (2003) Tulipa. // Flora of North America, vol. 26, p. 199.
Tyshchenko E.L., Timkina YU.V. (2011) Metodicheskie aspekty ocenki dekorativnyh priznakov gibiskusa sirijskogo (Hibiscus syriacus L.) [Methodological aspects of the evaluation of decorative signs of Syriac hibiscus (Hibiscus syriacus L.)] // Politematicheskij setevoj Nauchnyj zhurnal Kubanskogo Gosudarstvennogo agrarnogo universiteta, vol. 66(02). pp. 5-17.
Veldkamp J.F., Zonneveld B.J.M. (2011) The infrageneric nomenclature of Tulipa (Liliaceae). // Plant Systematics and Evolution, vol. 298, P. 87.
Zonneveld J.M. (2009) The systematic value of nuclear genome size for “all” species of Tulipa L. (Liliaceae). // Plant Systematics and Evolution, vol. 281, P. 217.