ВОЗМОЖНОСТИ ПРИМЕНЕНИЯ МОЛОЧНОКИСЛЫХ БАКТЕРИЙ ВЫДЕЛЕННЫХ ИЗ ШУБАТА В ПРОИЗВОДСТВЕ ПРОБИОТИЧЕСКОГО ПРЕПАРАТА ДЛЯ БРОЙЛЕРОВ
Ключевые слова:
пробиотические бактерии, функциональные свойства, шубат, птицеводство.Аннотация
Производство и разработка пробиотических препаратов активных отношении ряда патогенов, приобретают свою актуальность, наряду с мировой тенденцией отказа от использования традиционных антибиотических препаратов в производстве пищевой продукции. Причиной служит рост антибиотикорезистентности в частности наблюдался у таких патогенных тест-штаммов, как: Escherichia coli, Staphylococcus aureus, Listeria monocytogenes, Salmonella typhi. Среди наиболее часто встречающихся представителей молочнокислых бактерий шубата и верблюжьего молока можно встретить: Enterococcus spp., Lactococcus spp., Lactobacillus spp., Leuconostoc spp. Данные виды микроорганизмов обладают функциональными пробиотическими свойствами, которые могут найти свое применение в разработке пробиотического препарата для сельскохозяйственных животных и птиц. В статье приводятся результаты по изучению функциональных пробиотических свойств лактобактерий верблюжьего молока и данные о возможном применении этих штаммов в птицеводстве. Описываются методы оценки пробиотического потенциала включающие: способность к выживанию в агрессивной среде пищеварительного тракта, изучение антагонистической активности, адгезии и синтезу биологически активных веществ. Изучение данной тематики актуально и имеет широкие возможности применения в производстве ветеринарных пробиотических препаратов, с целью минимизации и отказа антибиотических веществ в качестве факторов роста и противодействия бактериальных заболеваний животных.
Библиографические ссылки
1. Maron D.F., Smith T.J., Nachman K.E. Restrictions on antimicrobial use in food animal production: an international regulatory and economic survey// Nachman Global Health -2013. Vol. 9, No.48. - P. 23-24.
2. WHO Regional Office for Europe Antimicrobial Medicines Consumption Network (2020): AMC data 2011 2017. Published on the Internet; https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/330466 License: CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO.
3. Vieco-Saiz N., Belguesmia Y., Raspoet R., et al. Benefits and Inputs From Lactic Acid Bacteria and Their Bacteriocins as Alternatives to Antibiotic Growth Promoters During Food-Animal Production// Front Microbiol. - 2019.-Vol.10, No. 57. - P 55-110.
4. Arauz L.J., Jozala A.F., Mazzola, G.P., Penna V.T. Nisin biotechnological production and application: // Trends in Food Science & technology-2009.Vol. 20, No. 3-4.- P. 146-154.
5. Rahmeh R., Akbar A., Kishk M., Al-Onaizi T., Al-Azmi A., Al-Shatti A., Shajan A., Al-Mutairi S. and Akbar B. Distribution and antimicrobial activity of lactic acid bacteria from raw camel milk// New Microbes and New Infections - 2019. - Vol. 30, No. 1. - P. 64-72.
6. Edalati E., Saneei B., Alizadeh M., Hosseini S. , Zahedi Bialvaei A. ,and Taheri K. Isolation of probiotic bacteria from raw camel’s milk and their antagonistic effects on two bacteria causing food poisoning // New Microbe and New Infect 2019. Vol. 27, No. 4. - P. 64 68.
7. Fasoli S., Marzotto M., Rizzotti L., Rossi F., Dellaglio F., Torriani S. Bacterial composition of commercial probiotic products as evaluated by PCR-DGGE analysis// International Journal of Food Microbiology -2003. Vol.82. – P. 59–70.
8. Rahman N., Xiaohong F., Meiqin D. Mingsheng Characterization of the dominant microflora in naturally fermented camel milk shubat// World Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology -2009. - Vol.25, No. 17. – P. 1941–1946.
9. Ouwehand A., Salminen, E., Isolauri S. Probiotics: an overview of benefical effects // Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek- 2002. - Vol. 82, No. 1–4. - P. 279–289.
10. Zaslavskaya M.I, Makhrova T.V., Aleksandrova, N.A., Ignatova N.I., Belova I.V., Tochilina A.G., Solovyeva I.V. Prospects for using bacteriocins of normal microbiota in antibacterial therapy (review). // Sovremennye tehnologii v medicine-2019.-Vol. 11, No. 3.- P. 136–145.
11. Hamed E. and Elattar A. Identification and Some Probiotic Potential of Lactic Acid Bacteria Isolated From Egyptian Camels Milk // Life Science Journal- 2013. - Vol. 10, No. 1.-P. 1953-1966.
12. Akhmetsadykova Sh., Baubekova A., Konuspayeva G., Akhmetsadykov N. , Faye B. Loiseau G. Lactic acid bacteria biodiversity in raw and fermented camel milk // African Journal of Food Science and Technology-2015.-Vol. 6, - P. 84-88.
13. Peres C.M., Alves M., Hernandez-Mendoza A., Moreira L., Silva S., Bronze M. R., Vilas-Boas L., Peres C., Malcata F. Novel isolates of lactobacilli from fermented Portuguese olive as potential probiotics// Food Science and Technology-2014.-Vol.59, No.11.-P. 234–246.
14. Ren D., Li.C, Qin Y., Yin R, Du S. ,Ye F., Liu C., Liu H., Wang M., Li Y., Yang S., Li X., Tian M., Jin N. In vitro evaluation of the probiotic and functional potential of Lactobacillus strains isolated from fermented food and human intestine// Anaerobe-2014.-Vol.30, No.7.-P. 47-53.
15. Xin L., Dang P., Liu B. Purification and partial characterization of a novel bacteriocin produced by Lactobacillus casei TN-2 isolated from fermented camel milk (Shubat) of Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous region, China// Food Control-2014.-Vol.43, No.9.-P. 276–283.
16. Kanwal A. Lactobacillus fermentum strains of dairy-product origin adhere to mucin and survive digestive juices// Journal of Medical Microbiology-2019.-Vol.68, No.3.-P. 1771–1786.
17. Timmerman H. Harro V., Elsen E., Rombouts F. and Beynen A. Mortality and Growth Performance of Broilers Given Drinking Water Supplemented with Chicken-Specific Probiotics// Poultry science -2006.-Vol.-85, No. 9.-P. 1383-1388.
18. Reuben R. C., Roy P.C., Sarkar S. L., Rubayet S. M., Jahid I. K. Characterization and evaluation of lactic acid bacteria from indigenous raw milk for potential probiotic properties// American Dairy Science-2020.-Vol.103, No.2.-P. 1223-1237.
19. Rowles H. Lactobacillus fermentum as a Treatment for Intestinal Infection// Journal of probiotic and health -2017.-Vol.5, No.1.-P. 24-27.
20. Raman M., Banu S. Gomathinayagam. S Lesion scoring technique for assessing the virulence and pathogenicity of Indian field isolates of avian Eimeria species// Veterinarski Archive-2011.- Vol. 81, No. 2, P. 259–271.
21. Lee S., Lillehoj S., Park W., Hong H., and Lin J., Effects of Pediococcus - and Saccharomyces-based probiotic (MitoMax) on coccidiosis in broiler chickens// Comparative Immunology, Microbiology and Infectious Diseases-2007.-Vol.30, No.4 P..261–268,
22. Benmouna Z., Dalache B., Zadi-Karam H., Karam N.E., Vuotto C. Ability of Three Lactic Acid Bacteria to Grow in Sessile Mode and to Inhibit Biofilm Formation of Pathogenic //Springer-2020.-Vol.68, No.2.-P. 122-137.
23. Cinara R. R.Cinara, Carmo M., Melo B., Alves M., Santos C., Monteiro S., Bomfim M., Fernandes E., Monteiro-Neto V. In Vitro Antimicrobial Activity and Probiotic Potential of Bifidobacterium and Lactobacillus against Species of Clostridium// Nutrients-2019.-Vol.11, No.2.-P. 448-462.
24. Fijan S. Influence of the Growth of Pseudomonas aeruginosa in Milk Fermented by Multispecies Probiotics and Kefir Microbiota// Journal of Probiotics & Health-2015.-Vol.4, No.1.-P. 46-52.
25. Burkholder K., Fletcher D., Gileau L., Kandolo A. Lactic acid bacteria decrease Salmonella enterica Javiana virulence and modulate host inflammation during infection of an intestinal epithelial cell line// Pathogens and Disease.-2019.-Vol.77, No.4.-P. 26-39.
26. Mulaw G., Tessema T.S., Muleta D., Tesfaye A. In Vitro Evaluation of Probiotic Properties of Lactic Acid Bacteria Isolated from Some Traditionally Fermented Ethiopian Food Products// Hindawi International Journal of Microbiology-2019. - Vol.43, No.9.-P. 276–283.
27. Eid R., El J., Kandil. Z., Hahne M, Seida A. Potential Antimicrobial Activities of Probiotic Lactobacillus Strains Isolated from Raw Milk// Probiotics & Health-2016. - Vol.4, No.4.-P. 54-58.
28. Park J.W., Jeong J. S., Lee S. I., Kim I. H. Effect of dietary supplementation with a probiotic (Enterococcus faecium) on production performance, excreta microflora, ammonia emission, and nutrient utilization in ISA brown laying hens// Poultry Science-2016.-Vol.-95, No. 7.-P. 48-52.
29. Smialek M., Kaczorek E., Szczucińska E., Burchardt S., Kowalczyk J., Tykałowski B., Koncicki A. Evaluation of Lactobacillus spp. and yeast based probiotic (Lavipan) supplementation for the reduction of Salmonella Enteritidis after infection of broiler chickens// Polish Journal of Veterinary Sciences-2019.-Vol.-22, No. 1.-P. 4-10.
2. WHO Regional Office for Europe Antimicrobial Medicines Consumption Network (2020): AMC data 2011 2017. Published on the Internet; https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/330466 License: CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO.
3. Vieco-Saiz N., Belguesmia Y., Raspoet R., et al. Benefits and Inputs From Lactic Acid Bacteria and Their Bacteriocins as Alternatives to Antibiotic Growth Promoters During Food-Animal Production// Front Microbiol. - 2019.-Vol.10, No. 57. - P 55-110.
4. Arauz L.J., Jozala A.F., Mazzola, G.P., Penna V.T. Nisin biotechnological production and application: // Trends in Food Science & technology-2009.Vol. 20, No. 3-4.- P. 146-154.
5. Rahmeh R., Akbar A., Kishk M., Al-Onaizi T., Al-Azmi A., Al-Shatti A., Shajan A., Al-Mutairi S. and Akbar B. Distribution and antimicrobial activity of lactic acid bacteria from raw camel milk// New Microbes and New Infections - 2019. - Vol. 30, No. 1. - P. 64-72.
6. Edalati E., Saneei B., Alizadeh M., Hosseini S. , Zahedi Bialvaei A. ,and Taheri K. Isolation of probiotic bacteria from raw camel’s milk and their antagonistic effects on two bacteria causing food poisoning // New Microbe and New Infect 2019. Vol. 27, No. 4. - P. 64 68.
7. Fasoli S., Marzotto M., Rizzotti L., Rossi F., Dellaglio F., Torriani S. Bacterial composition of commercial probiotic products as evaluated by PCR-DGGE analysis// International Journal of Food Microbiology -2003. Vol.82. – P. 59–70.
8. Rahman N., Xiaohong F., Meiqin D. Mingsheng Characterization of the dominant microflora in naturally fermented camel milk shubat// World Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology -2009. - Vol.25, No. 17. – P. 1941–1946.
9. Ouwehand A., Salminen, E., Isolauri S. Probiotics: an overview of benefical effects // Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek- 2002. - Vol. 82, No. 1–4. - P. 279–289.
10. Zaslavskaya M.I, Makhrova T.V., Aleksandrova, N.A., Ignatova N.I., Belova I.V., Tochilina A.G., Solovyeva I.V. Prospects for using bacteriocins of normal microbiota in antibacterial therapy (review). // Sovremennye tehnologii v medicine-2019.-Vol. 11, No. 3.- P. 136–145.
11. Hamed E. and Elattar A. Identification and Some Probiotic Potential of Lactic Acid Bacteria Isolated From Egyptian Camels Milk // Life Science Journal- 2013. - Vol. 10, No. 1.-P. 1953-1966.
12. Akhmetsadykova Sh., Baubekova A., Konuspayeva G., Akhmetsadykov N. , Faye B. Loiseau G. Lactic acid bacteria biodiversity in raw and fermented camel milk // African Journal of Food Science and Technology-2015.-Vol. 6, - P. 84-88.
13. Peres C.M., Alves M., Hernandez-Mendoza A., Moreira L., Silva S., Bronze M. R., Vilas-Boas L., Peres C., Malcata F. Novel isolates of lactobacilli from fermented Portuguese olive as potential probiotics// Food Science and Technology-2014.-Vol.59, No.11.-P. 234–246.
14. Ren D., Li.C, Qin Y., Yin R, Du S. ,Ye F., Liu C., Liu H., Wang M., Li Y., Yang S., Li X., Tian M., Jin N. In vitro evaluation of the probiotic and functional potential of Lactobacillus strains isolated from fermented food and human intestine// Anaerobe-2014.-Vol.30, No.7.-P. 47-53.
15. Xin L., Dang P., Liu B. Purification and partial characterization of a novel bacteriocin produced by Lactobacillus casei TN-2 isolated from fermented camel milk (Shubat) of Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous region, China// Food Control-2014.-Vol.43, No.9.-P. 276–283.
16. Kanwal A. Lactobacillus fermentum strains of dairy-product origin adhere to mucin and survive digestive juices// Journal of Medical Microbiology-2019.-Vol.68, No.3.-P. 1771–1786.
17. Timmerman H. Harro V., Elsen E., Rombouts F. and Beynen A. Mortality and Growth Performance of Broilers Given Drinking Water Supplemented with Chicken-Specific Probiotics// Poultry science -2006.-Vol.-85, No. 9.-P. 1383-1388.
18. Reuben R. C., Roy P.C., Sarkar S. L., Rubayet S. M., Jahid I. K. Characterization and evaluation of lactic acid bacteria from indigenous raw milk for potential probiotic properties// American Dairy Science-2020.-Vol.103, No.2.-P. 1223-1237.
19. Rowles H. Lactobacillus fermentum as a Treatment for Intestinal Infection// Journal of probiotic and health -2017.-Vol.5, No.1.-P. 24-27.
20. Raman M., Banu S. Gomathinayagam. S Lesion scoring technique for assessing the virulence and pathogenicity of Indian field isolates of avian Eimeria species// Veterinarski Archive-2011.- Vol. 81, No. 2, P. 259–271.
21. Lee S., Lillehoj S., Park W., Hong H., and Lin J., Effects of Pediococcus - and Saccharomyces-based probiotic (MitoMax) on coccidiosis in broiler chickens// Comparative Immunology, Microbiology and Infectious Diseases-2007.-Vol.30, No.4 P..261–268,
22. Benmouna Z., Dalache B., Zadi-Karam H., Karam N.E., Vuotto C. Ability of Three Lactic Acid Bacteria to Grow in Sessile Mode and to Inhibit Biofilm Formation of Pathogenic //Springer-2020.-Vol.68, No.2.-P. 122-137.
23. Cinara R. R.Cinara, Carmo M., Melo B., Alves M., Santos C., Monteiro S., Bomfim M., Fernandes E., Monteiro-Neto V. In Vitro Antimicrobial Activity and Probiotic Potential of Bifidobacterium and Lactobacillus against Species of Clostridium// Nutrients-2019.-Vol.11, No.2.-P. 448-462.
24. Fijan S. Influence of the Growth of Pseudomonas aeruginosa in Milk Fermented by Multispecies Probiotics and Kefir Microbiota// Journal of Probiotics & Health-2015.-Vol.4, No.1.-P. 46-52.
25. Burkholder K., Fletcher D., Gileau L., Kandolo A. Lactic acid bacteria decrease Salmonella enterica Javiana virulence and modulate host inflammation during infection of an intestinal epithelial cell line// Pathogens and Disease.-2019.-Vol.77, No.4.-P. 26-39.
26. Mulaw G., Tessema T.S., Muleta D., Tesfaye A. In Vitro Evaluation of Probiotic Properties of Lactic Acid Bacteria Isolated from Some Traditionally Fermented Ethiopian Food Products// Hindawi International Journal of Microbiology-2019. - Vol.43, No.9.-P. 276–283.
27. Eid R., El J., Kandil. Z., Hahne M, Seida A. Potential Antimicrobial Activities of Probiotic Lactobacillus Strains Isolated from Raw Milk// Probiotics & Health-2016. - Vol.4, No.4.-P. 54-58.
28. Park J.W., Jeong J. S., Lee S. I., Kim I. H. Effect of dietary supplementation with a probiotic (Enterococcus faecium) on production performance, excreta microflora, ammonia emission, and nutrient utilization in ISA brown laying hens// Poultry Science-2016.-Vol.-95, No. 7.-P. 48-52.
29. Smialek M., Kaczorek E., Szczucińska E., Burchardt S., Kowalczyk J., Tykałowski B., Koncicki A. Evaluation of Lactobacillus spp. and yeast based probiotic (Lavipan) supplementation for the reduction of Salmonella Enteritidis after infection of broiler chickens// Polish Journal of Veterinary Sciences-2019.-Vol.-22, No. 1.-P. 4-10.
Как цитировать
Кудайбергенова, А. К., Бегдильдаева, Н. Ж., Нургазина, А. С., & Ахметсадыкова, Ш. Н. (2021). ВОЗМОЖНОСТИ ПРИМЕНЕНИЯ МОЛОЧНОКИСЛЫХ БАКТЕРИЙ ВЫДЕЛЕННЫХ ИЗ ШУБАТА В ПРОИЗВОДСТВЕ ПРОБИОТИЧЕСКОГО ПРЕПАРАТА ДЛЯ БРОЙЛЕРОВ. Вестник КазНУ. Серия биологическая, 85(4). извлечено от https://bb.kaznu.kz/index.php/biology/article/view/1529
Выпуск
Раздел
МИКРОБИОЛОГИЯ
